I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so." Does it really matter that less than 15% of the Southern whites owned slaves.? After all, they were the same states that decided to accept the constitution and the authority of the federal government. The south disagreed with … As the North chose to abolish slavery without constitutional authority, they embraced the belief that that the end justifies the means, a philosophy that we find later in history with the advent of communism. Like Reply. 20 Tweets Dragging Roseanne Barr To A White Privilege Hell, Top 10 Most Politically Significant Bob Marley Songs, Nina Simone To Billie Holiday: 10 Civil Rights Protest Songs. It is almost impossible to imagine the Civil War erupting without the passions aroused among Northern abolitionists and those in the South who saw slave-holding as central to their way of life. Most importantly the War for Southern Independence expressed the inviolable right of the people to be self-governing. Beginning as a battle of army versus army, the war became a conflict of society against society. The war did not start because of slavery, it was a war for states rights. The real issue was the South was an oligarchy of big land owners that ruled unfairly. If it is, Then it is not a true union at all. The Civil War profoundly shaped the United States as we know it today. I only need to put this because I need an other 13 words, 1: Just because someone stops you from doing something, That does not mean that you just go on your own, Especially when they are in charge of you. The agrarian system has worked very well for the South and made it very wealthy. Second, they were traitors and rebels which is unacceptable considering all the violence and destruction their war caused. Thank you. The two sides involved in the American Civil War were the Union, which represented the North, and the Confederacy, which represented the South. First and foremost, Allowing a constitutional way of getting rid of something that was, Economically speaking, Impossible at the time while ensuring the sovereign responsibilities of states. The main objective was to save the union. That is still 15% too much of people treating those of African decent poorly by whippings, poor living conditions, or selling off family members to other Southern whites. The South could not have existed for long without the economic and manufacturing might of the North. McClellan, in command of Federal forces in southern Ohio, advanced on his own initiative in the early summer of 1861 into western Virginia with about 20,000 men. This war lasted from 1861-1865 and divided the nation into the “north” and the “south”. The South was desperate for British intervention. The Civil War ended in December 1865, and the slaves were free. Unfortunately, that success was achieved through the exploitation of millions of slaves, many of whom were brought to the United States against their will and then abused, tortured and killed in the name of building the South. Songs About Living While Black In The U.S.A. General Lee expected Slavery to end on its own. The South had prospered in the 1850s, like the North, and when a financial panic had struck in 1857 the South, unlike the North, had largely escaped its effects. Several Ron Paul supporters have asked that the video be taken down, from the pro-Confederate channel, Patriot Review but Patriot Review believes that the video could help Paul win South Carolina. Ron Paul Was Implicated In Failed White Supremacist Island Invasion, Top 10 Racist Ron Paul Friends, Supporters. The North and its troops originally fought because they felt the South had no legal right to secede from the Union and was close to treason. Even though the breaking point of the States' Rights argument was the issue of slavery, the states' rights issue has been debated since the beginning of America's Independence, as debated between Hamilton and Jefferson. When antislavery candidate Abraham Lincoln was elected president (1860), the Southern states seceded. When antislavery candidate Abraham Lincoln was elected president (1860), the Southern states seceded. The North and its troops originally fought because they felt the South had no legal right to secede from the Union and was close to treason. The Civil War in the United States began in 1861, after decades of simmering tensions between northern and southern states over slavery, states’ rights and westward expansion. The North and the South went to war for very different reasons. Until the Civil War, Southern presidents and lawmakers had dominated the federal government. Everyone knows what the American Civil War was all about, right? T he South saw President Lincoln as a threat to their way of life and upon his election, South Carolina immediately seceded and many other states followed. Next, another reason that was believed to have caused the Civil War was that the south feared that the north would have the majority of the senate. Thats all I got. Next both sides would have kept or got ride of slavery to end the war. On the contrary, It was Ulysses S. Grant who owned slaves during the war, Not Lee. Their well-researched arguments demonstrate the South's many legitimate complaints during the antebellum period, including unfair taxation and unequal constitutional rights. The disaffected regions would embrace the Republican party after the Civil War; some remained strongholds well into the twentieth century. There were many causes of the Civil war, but it is the results that are important. Yes, I do, The federal government had no buiseness screwing with the economy of states whom they did not know enough about to pass judgment on. To win the war, the South had only to survive. First, the South couldn’t have won the civil war because state’s rights prevented unification of the South. Why was the Civil War Fought? The Civil War is a well-known war taught in every school. And while it’s true that the North did not go to war to free the slaves — they fought to preserve the union — the South went to war to preserve one states’ right: the right to own slaves. In many areas, cropland was ruined, livestock lost, railroads destroyed, and billions of dollars in slave-related investments wiped out. the south wanted more individual state rights,some wanted slavery,and some wanted to secede.But slavery wasn't the main reason for the civil war Reasons for Civil War. In the years after the civil war, white southerners followed Lee’s cue, telling an emotionally powerful story of a heroic and noble struggle against overwhelming odds. Since the north had more people they thought that they should have more people in the senate. American Civil War, four-year war (1861–65) fought between the United States and 11 Southern states that seceded to form the Confederate States of America. what if the south won the civil war alternate history Nevertheless, the war remains one of the most misunderstood events in American history. BatmanoftheJLA. Cotton was a huge export earner for the US, North and south. Historians looked more closely at slavery, and saw a rapidly expanding, even thriving, system. Protectionist tariffs was another item the Confederate Constitution banned, Something the northern states desperately wanted because of the industrial advantage over the agricultural South. People take the Civil War three ways ONE: Your with the South and your racistTWO:Your not with the South and you take racism the wrong way and you act racist like XXX THREE:Your with the North and you hate slavery. So what was it all about? So goes the inevitable response when one brings up the Civil War within earshot of a Confederate apologist. Southern cotton production in 1870 was half what it was in 1860. Copyright © 2020 Interactive One, LLC. The Civil War (1861–1865) was the bloodiest war in American history. The following are nine of the many arguments that have been put forward for why the Confederacy lost. They are nothing if not predictable. The war was due to withdrawing of them from the Union. On the other hand, for the North to win, the Union had to be restored. Despite being Michigan-born—and living, at various times, in the East and Midwest—I grew up hearing this claim. During the Civil War, the North and South had several different views on the way of life. Not only did they oppress African-Americans, but also, lower class whites. Each and every state has a constitutional right to succeed from the union. The South was fighting for a number of things. And certainly the North's main objective was not to abolish slavery, though it was an objective. The American Civil War started on April 12, 1861 from open fire on Fort Sumter, and took place all across America. This all comes from the basic understanding of a fundamental principle stated by Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence, Originally taken from the philosopher John Lock. ... Before the war, South Carolina did more than any other Southern state to advance the notion that a state had the right to nullify federal laws, and even to secede from the United States. The South started the actual war and then the North chose to fight back. The South Was Right!, the Kennedy brothers dispel many commonly held beliefs about the Civil War. Many people still do not believe that Civil war occurred because of slavery. North was mainly industrial and the south agricultural and the north wanted to out law slavery which would be detrimental to the souths agriculture. Yes, slavery was an evil that needed to be abolished but, according to the constitution, that was a decision to be made at a state level. In 2011, South Sudan gained independence from Sudan, marking an end to Africa's longest-running civil war. It was the Confederate Constitution that banned the over sea slave trade, Not the U. S. Constitution. The North's focus was not to end slavery but to preserve the union. Had very little to do with slavery and everything to do with money and power. The South seceded before the new Republican government of Abraham Lincoln took any action to restrict slavery in the south or any other institutions of Southern states. As Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens put it, … In waging war, the South faced problems of politics and government that greatly complicated its problem of economic mobilization. They did not like being in a country that was, they felt, dominated by the North. The confederates could never have been considered the good guys in the civil war.They supported slavery which many would consider one of the worse sins ever and they wanted to split the union up which could also be considered a pretty bad sin considering it was important to Lincoln that the union stay together. The effects stem way past wanting slaves just cause the have no rights and they wanted to own. In any case, the rational for saying that states rights was the cause of the Civil War was wrong. Forcing people to do what you want, Whipping them when they don't, Barely having enough to survive, It's just pure wrong doing that sort of actuions. The Civil War was about just one states' right: the right to own slaves. The Civil War and its aftermath of hyper-federalism masked why the Deep South began secession after Lincoln's election in 1860. The South’s opposition to states’ rights is not surprising. Unfortunately it was labour intensive and the northern traders were happy to import and sell slaves to the Southern cotton growers. The American Civil War (1861-1865) was one of the bitterest civil wars in the world. There is no reason to believe that the South was right in their position. They viewed the North as Tyrannical, Imposing taxation and unfair legislation that hurt the South financially. The two sides involved in the American Civil War were the Union, ... which represented the South. If slavery was the main issue, than why didn't the North make slavery illegal and then go to war in order to support the law? The Civil War was in reality the War for Southern Independence - freedom from rigid economic controls by northern industrialists who influenced government - NOT an issue of slavery. Paul also fails to bring up the fact that it was the South that started the war by attacking the North in 1861. But it is erroneous to say that the death and mayhem of the "Civil War" (or revolution of 1863 as I prefer to call it) was all for the preservation of the institution of slavery. The North’s advantages in finance, population, railroads, manufacturing, technology, and naval assets, among others, are often cited as prohibitively decisive. By the civil-rights era, historical interpretations of the war were shifting. 150 Years After Fort Sumter: Why We're Still Fighting the Civil War North and South shared the burden of slavery, and after the war, they shared in forgetting about it. The Civil War profoundly shaped the United States as we know it today. Not surprisingly, in the south there were high levels of discontent, which came to a head in 1955-1972 with the First Sudanese Civil War, then again in the Second Sudanese Civil War … Paul would also claim that he wouldn’t have voted for it at the time, putting him on the side of the racists in both the fight against slavery and the fight against Jim Crow segregation, the two defining struggles of Black people in America. Therefore they have the same right to break the political bonds which tied them to the union. 1 The War for States' Rights: Secession Crisis ; 2 National Constitution Center: Ron Paul: Secession is right, Civil War maybe not ; 3 John's History Vortex: The Legality of Secession in the United States ; 4 The Washington Post: Five myths about why the South seceded ; 5 The Post and Courier: History shows secession was about slavery The south seceded from the Union and fought the Civil War, not to uphold states’ rights, but to defend slavery. Many Americans kept on discussing about the beginning of the Civil war. If they do take it down,  Charles Johnson at Little Green Footballs has downloaded a copy of the video. An extensive amount of effort has gone into studying the American Civil War. Civil War wasn't to end slavery Purposes: The South fought to defend slavery. The Civil War was absolutely about slavery. In this kind of war, the ability to mobilize economic resources, the effectiveness of political leadership, and a society’s willingness to keep up the fight despite setbacks, are as crucial to the outcome as success or failure on the battlefields. For nearly a century, the people and politicians of the Northern and Southern states had been clashing over the issues that finally led to war: economic interests, cultural values, the power of the federal government to control the states, and, most importantly, slavery in American society. Each region relied on one another for resources, and when it’s all just one country it is a lot easier to trade around. It arose out of disputes over slavery and states’ rights. States' Rights is seen as one of the major causes of The Civil War. As Confederate monuments come down across the South, the Civil War has once again become a lightning rod throughout the United States. The victorious North rewrote history to justify its invasion of the South, which was legally and culturally a separate, independent country… American Civil War, four-year war (1861–65) fought between the United States and 11 Southern states that seceded to form the Confederate States of America. The Confederate States were fighting for their right to govern in a manner which would allow the state to survive economically. The South definitely won the Civil War. Since civil war broke out in South Sudan in December 2013, over 50,000 people have been killed—possibly as many as 383,000, according to a recent estimate—and nearly … They caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of young men. The north did not fight to free slaves they fought for total control of the government. Ron Paul has made no secret the fact that he thought that the South was right in the Civil War. Here are ten basic facts you need to know about America's defining struggle. Since the North won the war, the federal government has grown in power and now believes it has full authority over state governments. Why did the South Lose the Civil War? The Civil War erupted from a variety of long-standing tensions and disagreements about American life and politics. Here are ten basic facts you need to know about America's defining struggle. Ron Paul was also was the only member of congress to vote against honoring the Civil Rights Act Of 1964 on its 40th anniversary in 2004. Many of the monuments’ defenders have claimed that the Civil War was not about slavery but instead about states’ rights. Slavery undermines the rights and freedoms due to all humans. Students of all age groups know at least something about this war. The civil war, however, was not fought on the issue of slavery. Jefferson Davis himself actually wrote in letter to his wife that slave property in the South would "eventually be lost. " All Rights Reserved. This war is often described as "the bloodiest war," and many soldiers fought in the Civil War. In 1863 Lincoln abolished slavery in the South. It was the Confederacy that paid its black soldiers equal wages, Not the northern army. The South’s inner civil war not only helped weaken the Confederate war effort but bequeathed to Reconstruction explosive political issues, unresolved questions, and broad opportunities for change. Did the South secede because of slavery? Secession was based on the idea of state rights (or "states rights," a variant that came into use after the Civil War). There were numerous reason behind why each side's soldiers fought for one side or the other. The South’s inner civil war reflected how wartime events and Confederate policies eventually reacted upon the region’s distinctive social and political structure. I'm not here to address an argument over whether the South could have won the War. Abraham Lincoln commonly made racist remarks about blacks and actually said that he was really concerned that the Union be preserved. Make no mistake, slavery was behind everything that led to the American Civil War. The education system in the South had virtually disappeared, along with the old plantation system. The north trampled all over the south, by taxing their goods, restricting their congressional powers, and forcing the northern way of life on the south. It was in South Carolina that the Civil War began, when the Confederacy fired on Fort Sumter. It was not because Lincoln had … The primary cause of the war was the status of slavery in the nation and its newly acquired territories. It arose out of disputes over slavery and states’ rights. But tigether thr North &South form a mightier much more stable country, A country that has become one of the major, If not sole, World superpowers. Abraham Lincoln started the war by sending soldiers in to another country (Fort Sumter) because he wanted to preserve the Union. north, the Union wins the civil war, seemingly beating the much weaker south quickly and easily, to the clueless onlooker, but the war was very hard fought through deadly battles and bloodshed, with both sides coming close to beating each other out, at one point or another. Most importantly the War for Southern Independence expressed the inviolable right of the people to be self-governing. They wanted to preserve Slavery to maintain their way of life as well as their economy, However, As history has proved time and again, A country cannot succeed off of slavery, So it would have been abolished anyways. What has not been discussed in this too much was the British aristocracy’s (and rumoured royal) hidden support for the CSA and desire to go to their aid. Civil War broke out in 1861 on the issue of secession. Do you believe the South was in the wrong in the Civil War? 2 The confederacy was GOOD!! What if the South won the Civil War? American Civil War - American Civil War - The land war: The first military operations took place in northwestern Virginia, where nonslaveholding pro-Union Virginians sought to secede from the Confederacy. Until the Civil War, Southern presidents and lawmakers had dominated the federal government. In this lesson, we'll look at the notion of states' rights and their role in the United States Civil War, as well as some examples of how states' rights were invoked regarding the question of slavery. The … It has become an accepted historical fact that the South could not have won the American Civil War. During the civil war in the United States, southern states fought to maintain the right to keep slaves, while the north and the President fought to release them to freedom. If he can march right through the heart of … What caused the Civil War? This was something I, myself, was also surprised to learn in my American Civil War History class when I … Do I think Northern 'Bullying' tactics such as tariffs and taxes was wrong? The Civil War was a series of battles between the North and the South over issues such as slavery and states' rights. The South was fed up with the Union because of the corruptness that was sinking into the federal government. There is no reason to believe that the South was right in their position. South wanted to keep slavery, but North opposed slavery and thought it was not right. Slavery undermines the rights and freedoms due to all humans. Certainly not the constitution. … Ron Paul is a neo-Confederate, and proud member of the Ludwig Von Mises Institute, which has been labeled as a neo-Confederate organization. We, Too, Sing America! In their best-selling book, The South Was Right!, the Kennedy brothers dispel many commonly held beliefs about the Civil War. While this may be a worthy aim, It is critical to understand that, As Andrew Jackson said, " the Union cannot be preserved through force. " One main problem was that the states did not have enough power, and the fed was too powerful. To some extent yes but not nearly as much as people would have me believe. If Lee was right, historians need not look south of the Mason-Dixon line to explain the war’s outcome: the answer is simply the old story of the biggest battalions winning. The Union definitely had a significant advantage with a higher population, more industry, and a more massive army. Their well-researched arguments demonstrate the South's many legitimate complaints during the antebellum period, including unfair taxation and unequal constitutional rights. A second reason why the American Civil War was necessary was because our country needed both the South and North regions to survive. Here he is giving a speech in front of a giant Confederate Flag about why he believes the North was wrong in the Civil War and why the South was right. The Confederacy was, Simply put, Too weak to stand by itself on the world stage with a small population, Weak industrial/infastructural base, And over reliance on an agricultural society it could not hope to compete with the powers of Europe at that time. In the video he claims that the North should have paid to buy slaves from southern slave owners to avoid the war, rather than the South renouncing slavery. Would it be better to say that we could fight a war if 50% or 75% of Southern whites owned slaves? Then after they took office they managed to pass Jim Crow laws and Black Codes. 1. Fact #1: The Civil War was fought between the Northern and the Southern states from 1861-1865. It generally rested on the theory of state sovereignty-- that in the United States the ultimate source of political authority lay in the separate states. I respect the Confederates for their determination and great fighting skills, but I do not believe their cause was Just. The basic reason why the South wanted to win in the American Civil War was so that they could govern themselves. The nation was shattered into North and South by blue and gray. Saying the Confederate States of America fought the entire war for slavery is as ludicrous as it is naively biased. The South has a Constitutional Right to leave the United States of America (States Rights, Secession). They hoped to be treated as equal citizens who could vote, gain an education and live peacefully and equally with the whites. The south was right and they should have won. The South was Right. Slavery was legal in the North well into the conflict. Nevertheless, the war remains one of the most misunderstood events in American history. Thank you for hearing me out and may God bless you all. This exalted the powers of the individual states as opposed to those of the Federal government. The discrimination system was really about social class more than skin color. The war was basically about state's rights. In many ways, the North and South were fighting for the same thing in the Civil War: their right to maintain a way of life that worked for them. I also believe that the South, given time, would have ended slavery on it's own if they had won the war, but one state at a time as the constitution directs. The South in reality was trying to assert it’s own authority over the North with the Fugitive Slave acts or the ruling of the Dread Scott decision. Did the North care about abolishing slavery? By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. The right of property in slaves was recognized by giving to free persons distinct political rights, by giving them the right to represent, and burthening them with direct taxes for three-fifths of their slaves; by authorizing the importation of slaves for twenty years; and by stipulating for the rendition of … Recent Developments. The problem is that he stopped the rebellion by force-not negotiation. The reasons for the war and its outcome remain hotly debated. Do I think the war was about slavery? In part, this was the result of the war strategies of both sides. Wikimedia Commons A statue of Confederate General Robert E. Lee is removed from its perch in New Orleans on May 19, 2017. There were numerous reason behind why each side's soldiers fought for one side or the other. Report Post. During the civil war in the United States, southern states fought to maintain the right to keep slaves, while the north and the President fought to release them to freedom. Fact #1: The Civil War was fought between the Northern and the Southern states from 1861-1865. The south's main purpose was to keep their slaves. Ron Paul has made no secret the fact that he thought that the South was right in the Civil War. The Consent of the Governed. The very issue that created the Confederacy helped to destroy it. He's trying to demonstrate that the South has no power that can prevent the North from prevailing in this war. That was the "states rights" they were fighting for. Not only that but not a single slave was freed during the war unless they fought in the armies. Before the war, the South’s economy had been based almost strictly on agriculture, mainly cotton, tobacco, and sugar, and all these industries suffered, especially cotton. Since civil war broke out in South Sudan in December 2013, over 50,000 people have been killed—possibly as many as 383,000, according to a … After succession they fired on fort Sumter with no attempts to negotiate first. But two years later, violent conflict broke out after political disagreement between President Salva Kiir and former Vice President Riek Machar and the fighting continues to this day. So the poor whites were getting the short end of the deal by supporting slavery or segregation laws. Seidule clearly and comprehensively explains why the Civil War was, in fact, motivated by the South's desire to preserve slavery. Slavery was permanently abolished in America and the United States was United once again. The Civil War was in reality the War for Southern Independence - freedom from rigid economic controls by northern industrialists who influenced government - NOT an issue of slavery. It was fought because the Southern States had left the Union. It’s a pervasive myth, even outside the Old Confederate South. They were victims of discrimination by the upper class whites too. There were two sides; North and South. The abolition of slavery itself was never a direct Union war aim until 1863 when Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation , declaring freedom for over three million slaves in the South. Civil War to Civil Rights - Summary Report Civil War to Civil Rights Commemoration - Summary Report One hundred-fifty years ago, competing visions for the country and conflicting definitions of freedom led to a war that threatened the very existence of the United States. 2:when is slavery ever right in the entire universe. First off, they supported Slavery which is in itself morally wrong. The state’s casus belli was neither vague nor hard to comprehend : Few of their leaders even believed they were right. The North was a greatly industrialized zone at the time, while the South was exceedingly agricultural. What gave Lincoln the right to actively STOP the rebellion. People believe that the war happened keeping in view of the rights of the Southern nationals. When Lincoln, who opposed slavery, was elected president, this caused conflict with the South, who viewed slavery as a way of life. The ensuing Civil War (1861–65) wrought immense destruction on much of the South, which emerged the loser in the conflict. The Civil War had a huge effect on the United States of America, but especially on the former Confederacy in the South of the country. Like a massive earthquake, the Civil War and the destruction of slavery permanently altered the landscape of Southern life, exposing and widening fault lines that had lain barely visible just beneath the surface. Most of the fighting during the American Civil War took place on Southern soil. This is why our founding fathers led a revolution against the British, And I would remind JMan that realistically they were "rebels" guilty of treason against the king. The South’s opposition to states’ rights is not surprising.